Injured at sea? Protect your rights.
1 (800) 262-8529 - Free Initial Consultation

Contact Form

* Completing the contact form does not create an attorney-client relationship with Anderson Carey Williams & Neidzwski

Meet the Attorneys

David B. Anderson
David B. Anderson
Gordon T. Carey, Jr.
Gordon T. Carey, Jr.
Douglas R. Williams
Douglas R. Williams
Nicholas J. Neidzwski
Nicholas J. Neidzwski
The Maritime Law Association of the United States Logo

David B. Anderson, Gordon T. Carey, Douglas R. Williams, and Nicholas J. Neidzwski are proud members of the Maritime Law Association of the United States.

View Our Blog

Punitive Damages in Maintenance & Cure

Maintenance and cure claims may seem like the commercial seaman’s goldmine, but in reality recovery under maintenance and cure is a burden that the plaintiff must carry.

Recovery for injury to a seaman at sea falls under the Jones Act. All maritime employees are required to maintain Jones Act Insurance. Many individuals fail to realize that an injured seaman may be entitled to punitive damages as a result of an employer’s failure to fulfill a maintenance and cure claim.

Punitive damages are damages designed to punish a defendant for wrongdoing and they generally exceed compensatory damages. According to the U.S. Supreme Court in Atlantic Sounding Co, Inc., v. Townsend, 557 U.S. 404 (2009), a plaintiff does not have to rely on the Jones Act to make a claim for punitive damages. Punitive damages are a long accepted remedy under general maritime law.

Attorney Defending Maintenance and Cure Claims in Washington, California, Alaska, and Oregon

Anderson Carey Williams & Neidzwski are located at offices in Bellingham and Seattle, Washington, Portland, Oregon, and San Francisco, California, to service clients throughout the area. We file personal injury claims under the Jones Act and other general maritime law claims across the Pacific Northwest.

Our attorneys represent both the plaintiffs and the defendants of maritime injury claims. In the past we have represented longshoremen as land-based non-seamen, who bring claims for personal injury under the Longshore and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act (LHWCA).

Contact our office to learn more about the kinds of services our firm offers, including motions to reinstate and motions to initiate maintenance and cure benefits.

Call 1 (800) 262-8529 now to schedule a confidential consultation with our personal injury and maritime lawyers in Portland, OR, Bellingham and Seattle, WA, or San Francisco, CA.

Information Center

Back to top

Proving Maintenance and Cure

In any maintenance and cure claim, the plaintiff has the burden of proof, slight though it may be. Thus, the plaintiff must show that he was injured or became ill while subject to the call of duty as a seaman. The burden of establishing the amount of maintenance and cure owed to a seaman is also feather light. The plaintiff is required to show the following:

When a defendant’s failure to provide for maintenance and cure worsens the plaintiff’s injury, then the plaintiff may also recover damages resulting from such injuries, including pain and suffering and additional medical expenses.

Back to top

Proving the Defendant Failed to Provide Maintenance and Cure

To obtain punitive damages, it is not enough to simply show that the plaintiff was owed maintenance and cure, a plaintiff must also show that the defendant, willfully and wantonly failed to pay the plaintiff’s claim. The plaintiff must show that the defendant wantonly, willfully, and recklessly did any of the following:

Back to top

Useful Definitions for Maintenance and Cure Claims

In order to understand whether an employer intentionally neglected to provide maintenance and cure benefits, it is important to understand what constitutes maintenance benefits and what constitutes cure benefits.

Back to top

Atlantic Sounding Co. Inc. v. Townsend

The question presented to the Court was whether an injured seaman could recover punitive damages for his employer’s willful failure to pay maintenance and cure.

The Court, in an opinion delivered by Justice Thomas, held that a plaintiff could seek to recover punitive damages for his or hers employer’s willful failure to pay maintenance and cure.

Thus, a seaman may seek punitive damages when his or her employer willfully and wantonly fails to pay maintenance and cure claims as required by the Jones Act. The Court’s rationale was, since punitive damages have been an accepted remedy under general maritime law for so long, and nothing in the Jones Act prevented this remedy, such damages for willful and wanton disregard for the maintenance and cure obligation should remain available as a matter of general maritime law. Atlantic Sounding Co. Inc., v. Townsend, 557 U.S. 404, 129 S.Ct. 2561, 2563-64 (2009).

Back to top

Additional Resources

Atlantic Sounding Co. v. Townsend, 557 U.S. 404 (2009) – Visit, for a short synopsis of the case, including the decision poll, and the lower court information, the plaintiffs and the defendants, and the Justices sitting on the case. Oyez is a free law project by Cornell’s Legal Information Institute, dedicated to making the U.S. Supreme Court accessible.

Maintenance and Cure; Elements and Burden of Proof -- Visit the official website of the United States Courts for the Ninth Circuit for more information about jury instructions regarding proving maintenance and cure claims and what party has the burden of proof.

Back to top

Attorneys in Washington, Oregon, California, and Alaska for Maintenance and Cure Punitive Damages

The admiralty and maritime lawyers at Anderson Carey Williams & Neidzwski represent injured employees of commercial maritime companies. When a seaman is injured in service of a vessel, the law requires the employer to provide maintenance and cure benefits.

Our firm has offices in Seattle and Bellingham, Washington, Portland, Oregon, and San Francisco, California ready to fight for your right to receive benefits. If you or someone you know was injured in service of a vessel, contact Anderson Carey Williams & Neidzwski.

Call 1 (800) 262-8529 now to schedule a confidential consultation with one of our experienced attorneys.

This article was last updated on Tuesday, July 31, 2018.

What Our Clients Have To Say